Industrial Hygiene in Construction

The big industrial hygiene conference (AIHCe) is held in a different city each year. This year was Indy, Indiana. Below is my personal top ten list  of “lessons learned” from last week.

1. IH’s need to do a better job of sharing. We don’t share data, experiences, information, knowledge or our ideas well.
2. CPWR is trying to share. Center for Construction Research & Training.  I’m looking forward to seeing their published independent review of local exhaust ventilation (LEV) units.
3. The minimum exhaust rate for a portable exhaust unit must be 106 cfm (cubic feet per min) to capture particulates (dust, silica) during tuckpointing with a 5 in grinder (but it’s also a good rule of thumb).
4. Asphalt milling machines are still a huge silica problem. Water controls are NOT enough. You need a local exhaust system too. (here’s an earlier post I made on it)
5. GHS Safety Data Sheets – it’s not as complicated as you think. There are some significant changes, but don’t worry, OSHA’s here to help (ha). Seriously, more information will be available soon.
6. Ignite. Have you seen these before? Short, stand up speeches about their ideas/passions. Similar to TED. Some were better than others. But, did I mention they were short?
7. Committees. Be careful when you open your mouth. My idea was so great, they are making me do it.
8.  ANSI A10.49! A health standard for construction. Great idea, but lots of work.
9. Check out Environment for Children. I don’t know much about it, but they have a great mission.  Believe me, in the US, we’re WAY ahead.
10. Presentation. It’s all up to you to make it. I will not cast blame on those who had bad presentations. BUT, it reminds me that I should work on this skill. Even if you have something good to say, if you give a horrible presentation, it’s likely no one will notice. On the other side, if your presentation is good, people will listen, even if you’re talking about nothing!  My favorite of the week: Dr. Mike Morgan (Univ. of Washington) on Chromium VI. He was very factual, not too flashy, and make the point without needless details.

As you may know, sometimes tin knockers (aka sheetmetal workers)  use sheet lead, or lead soldering, to make flashing on roof vents. Here is a picture of what these commonly look like (if there is (?) a common one).

The lead iron is heated up. Lead solder, or sometimes lead/zinc solder is used. Muratic acid (or similar) is used to clean the stainless steel. The iron is used to heat up the solder and drip it on the stainless surface. Anyways, the process creates lead fumes. This is dangerous both from airborne inhalables to the contact surfaces surrounding the area.

The surfaces around these areas are usually very high in lead content. There is not a OSHA standard for lead wipe tests. However, in the past OSHA has used the HUD standards and cited employers under the general duty clause. If you are performing these tasks, please make sure you are doing everything you can to limit the airborne, dermal, and ingestion exposure.

• Follow OSHA Lead Standard (1926.62).
• Train your employees.
• Ventilation (downdraft is best). This is the best way to control the fumes.
• Post signs in the area “lead work and hazardous”.
• Perform air monitoring. I have found levels both above, and below, the exposure limits.
• Wear a respirator (1/2 face negative air with HEPA).
• Do not: eat, drink or smoke in this area.
• Good hygiene. Wash after doing these activities.
• Use a plastic sheeting on all surfaces. This makes it 100x easier to clean up.

in other words, don’t do what is in this picture below:

To calculate the number of air changes per hour (N) you will need:

• area of the space (length, width, height) in cubic feet (ft3)
• fan or ventilation (in cubic feet per minute, or CFM)

The number of air changes per hour is calculated by:

N= (60 min/hour) (CFM of ventilation) / Total Cubic feet

How useful is this? Well, it’s a mixed bag.

On the downside:

• It assumes that the air mixes perfectly (which it never does) and that the fan is running properly and accurately. 

On the plus side:

• It does give you an idea of how fast the air is moving in proportion to the total area. That information can be very useful when comparing spaces, comparing the types of ventilation available, or attempting to control a hazardous atmosphere by dilution ventilation.

But, be warned: dilution ventilation is NOT a recommended control for a “dangerous” hazard. As they say, “dilution is not the solution to pollution”.